Five strategies scholars use in writing medical review.
Review articles should concentrate on only one or two clinical issues rather than survey an entire topic. For example, an article on prostate cancer might focus on PSA screening; an article on asthma might discuss the efficacy of allergy shots. Issues that may be of less importance to daily practice (eg, pathogenesis, molecular biology) should be covered as briefly as possible. When discussing.
Review articles present an excellent overview of material pertaining to a specific topic or clinical question. There are different formats used to write review articles, and within academic medicine, a debate over the best format for review articles exists. The focus of a review may dictate the format; however, regardless of the format chosen, a structured approach is critical for crafting a.
The structure of a literature review for an article. When a literature review exists as part of an introduction to a study, it follows the structure of the Introduction itself and moves from the general to the specific—presenting the broadest background information about a topic first and then moving to specific studies that support your study, finally leading to your hypothesis statement.
How to Review Articles. For the inexperienced or first time reviewer the peer review process can seem like a daunting one. Below we present some advice and guidance about how to conduct a review and put together a reviewer report that will be effective and beneficial to authors. Read our Reviewer Guide and watch our informative videos for further insight in to the peer review process.
How to write a good review. Good reviews are invaluable in helping the board or panel make funding decisions. They also provide constructive feedback to applicants to help them improve their research. Bear in mind how your review will be used. Board and panel members will use your comments and score to help them in their assessment. They may.
Sample Peer-Review of a Fictitious Manuscript Reviewer A’s Comments to Authors: This is a prospective study that analyzed the factors associated with cancer progression after EMR of Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade dysplasia. Eighty patients underwent EMR and were followed every 3 months for 1 year, and every 6 months thereafter for 3 years. Cancer progression was detected in 10%. Using.
Strategies scholars use when writing review articles include narrative review, systematic review, scoping, critical-realist and open peer commentary. Main Digest. Review articles in medical journals inform and enlighten physicians and other readers by summarizing the research on a given topic and setting the stage for further studies.